karma

Here’s a revised version of the first and last bullet points to reflect your explanation: First Bullet Point: "Q3-24 analysis indicates that while some differences between forecasts and actuals exist, there is less evidence of a systematic bias due to conservatism in the provided forecasts. The observed variances are likely attributed to external factors beyond the business's control." Last Bullet Point: "Despite the reduced signs of systematic bias in Q3-24, some differences remain, emphasizing the need to account for external factors to further refine the forecasting process." Let me know if this works! Here’s a reworded version of the text: --- Funded Assets: Two significant differences of 500M were observed in August and September 2024. Both differences are in opposite directions, suggesting no statistically significant pattern. These variances may not be due to a systematic underestimation of the forecast. A 500M difference was also observed in May 2024, re